← Back to context

Comment by justin66

22 days ago

Is there evidence that Broadcom sold those chips to the foundation for less than their own cost? That’s the claim I find a little strong. And I do understand that undercutting other nonprofit or small vendors might also be considered bad behavior, but it never sounded like there was a lot of demand for those particular chips (which were already on the edge of obsolescence, and were even in the process of being abandoned by Debian).

> Is there evidence that Broadcom sold those chips to the foundation for less than their own cost? That’s the claim I find a little strong.

For me, its beaten by the more effective claim Broadcom sold it /at/ cost.