Sure, but that's probably still just sample bias of presidents all being at least mostly anglo-saxon. Probably everyone on the British Isles is related to King John.
Seems unlikely in the 1700’s we’re talking ~20 generations and a population of 8+ million. It’s more believable if we are talking genetics, but ancestry.com is working off of official records.
Sure, but that's probably still just sample bias of presidents all being at least mostly anglo-saxon. Probably everyone on the British Isles is related to King John.
Seems unlikely in the 1700’s we’re talking ~20 generations and a population of 8+ million. It’s more believable if we are talking genetics, but ancestry.com is working off of official records.