← Back to context

Comment by prmoustache

14 days ago

Source of your data over 20 years?

If you look at nonfamily child abductions, most of them involve kids between 0 and 5. Also in a significant proportion of abduction, the kid is not even targeted as it involve parents leaving the kid in a car and the car is stolen.

why exclude family? that's the primary case is it not?

  • Because I guess a family abduction involve a good knowledge of the victim/behavior and I would guess the first thing the abductor would do is making sure he isn't tracked by getting rid of the phone and not using their own in a radius around the scene of the abduction.

    Quite a different set of parameters than abductors targetting random kids in a gas station and driving away with the car.