← Back to context

Comment by MonkeyClub

14 days ago

I don't think they were just

> a couple hundred years behind

They were, 16th century muskets aren't much better than bows and arrows.

  • They were at least 2000 years behind Europe in weapons and armor technology. Some cultures had bronze weapons, but no iron smelting or steel.

    Even before muskets started becoming common, European professional infantry had largely abandoned shields. Mass produced plate armor provided sufficient protection from arrows, and two-handed pikes were better than a pike and a shield.

    On the other hand, bows became more effective again as muskets improved. When a musket could penetrate any reasonable armor, personal protection became less important.