← Back to context Comment by the__alchemist 11 days ago Kagi's results for "baby peacock" are showing almost the same set (Mostly AI) as Google's. 4 comments the__alchemist Reply p3rls 10 days ago It's surprising how many times you see this pattern on HN"Google sucks!"(50 upvotes)"That's why I use Kagi!"(45 upvotes)"Actually Kagi has the exact same problem and you have to pay for it."(2 upvotes) louthy 11 days ago Search “peachick”, it works fine. I assume Google would be the same.I guess using the correct terminology matters. ceejayoz 11 days ago > I guess using the correct terminology matters.If people were actually searching up "peachick" that'd probably be SEO spammed to hell, too. andrewinardeer 11 days ago Kagi's images are an entirely different set for me.
p3rls 10 days ago It's surprising how many times you see this pattern on HN"Google sucks!"(50 upvotes)"That's why I use Kagi!"(45 upvotes)"Actually Kagi has the exact same problem and you have to pay for it."(2 upvotes)
louthy 11 days ago Search “peachick”, it works fine. I assume Google would be the same.I guess using the correct terminology matters. ceejayoz 11 days ago > I guess using the correct terminology matters.If people were actually searching up "peachick" that'd probably be SEO spammed to hell, too.
ceejayoz 11 days ago > I guess using the correct terminology matters.If people were actually searching up "peachick" that'd probably be SEO spammed to hell, too.
It's surprising how many times you see this pattern on HN
"Google sucks!"(50 upvotes)
"That's why I use Kagi!"(45 upvotes)
"Actually Kagi has the exact same problem and you have to pay for it."(2 upvotes)
Search “peachick”, it works fine. I assume Google would be the same.
I guess using the correct terminology matters.
> I guess using the correct terminology matters.
If people were actually searching up "peachick" that'd probably be SEO spammed to hell, too.
Kagi's images are an entirely different set for me.