← Back to context Comment by dyauspitr 8 hours ago Something that works for 95% of people with diabetes then. Fantastic! 4 comments dyauspitr Reply phil21 6 hours ago They really should be called different names. The diseases are really not all that similar other than (sometimes) the need to take insulin. kelnos 1 hour ago Well, 86% of the 14 people they tested this on, anyway. tzs 7 hours ago Don't only something like 25% of type 2 diabetics take insulin? coldcode 7 hours ago Most people with T2D do not take insulin, it's only useful if your body cannot make a sufficient amount. In my case I have no need for it, the cells became resistant to the effects of insulin. 25% is probably a decent estimate.
phil21 6 hours ago They really should be called different names. The diseases are really not all that similar other than (sometimes) the need to take insulin.
tzs 7 hours ago Don't only something like 25% of type 2 diabetics take insulin? coldcode 7 hours ago Most people with T2D do not take insulin, it's only useful if your body cannot make a sufficient amount. In my case I have no need for it, the cells became resistant to the effects of insulin. 25% is probably a decent estimate.
coldcode 7 hours ago Most people with T2D do not take insulin, it's only useful if your body cannot make a sufficient amount. In my case I have no need for it, the cells became resistant to the effects of insulin. 25% is probably a decent estimate.
They really should be called different names. The diseases are really not all that similar other than (sometimes) the need to take insulin.
Well, 86% of the 14 people they tested this on, anyway.
Don't only something like 25% of type 2 diabetics take insulin?
Most people with T2D do not take insulin, it's only useful if your body cannot make a sufficient amount. In my case I have no need for it, the cells became resistant to the effects of insulin. 25% is probably a decent estimate.