Comment by tpoacher
6 hours ago
Obviously this is slightly implementation dependent but if your tests are accompanied by programmatic documentation (that is output together with the test), doesn't that eliminate the need for a descriptive test name in the first place?
If anything, in this scenario, I wouldn't even bother printing the test names, and would just give them generated identifier names instead. Otherwise, isn't it a bit like expecting git hashes to be meaningful when there's a commit message right there?
No comments yet
Contribute on Hacker News ↗