Comment by mrkeen 16 days ago F# has "generics" just like Python and PHP now "have types".It's not a yes/no feature. 3 comments mrkeen Reply neonsunset 16 days ago Give F# a try. It has, and always had, true generics.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref... mrkeen 15 days ago > It's not a yes/no feature.FTFM: It's not a true/false feature. neonsunset 15 days ago Alright. Humor me, what is the issue with F# generics as compared to other languages with generics? Which implementation (that is productively useful) is a "true" one?
neonsunset 16 days ago Give F# a try. It has, and always had, true generics.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref... mrkeen 15 days ago > It's not a yes/no feature.FTFM: It's not a true/false feature. neonsunset 15 days ago Alright. Humor me, what is the issue with F# generics as compared to other languages with generics? Which implementation (that is productively useful) is a "true" one?
mrkeen 15 days ago > It's not a yes/no feature.FTFM: It's not a true/false feature. neonsunset 15 days ago Alright. Humor me, what is the issue with F# generics as compared to other languages with generics? Which implementation (that is productively useful) is a "true" one?
neonsunset 15 days ago Alright. Humor me, what is the issue with F# generics as compared to other languages with generics? Which implementation (that is productively useful) is a "true" one?
Give F# a try. It has, and always had, true generics.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref...
> It's not a yes/no feature.
FTFM: It's not a true/false feature.
Alright. Humor me, what is the issue with F# generics as compared to other languages with generics? Which implementation (that is productively useful) is a "true" one?